Need feedback for a module idea

Not sure about the usefulness of this as a mixer. But if this could be the starting point for an _CV adder,_ well...the ability to have that as a transposition tool for a general VCO group CV could be pretty useful as long as you could avoid the +5V ceiling (voltage limiting, natch). Then, instead of attenuations of the sort here, you could set up attenuation as an octave selection function, perhaps even in fifths? So you'd get something like an -1 8va, - P5, then 0, or -2 8Va, -1 8va, 0. Couple this with a buffered mult, and that would kick ass!

Hi Robert, I understand what you are trying to do, but  suspect this module would be too coarse for must functions - in audio tiny changes can have a big impact, and CV control can be equally fussy...  What I feel would be much more useful is a mixer with voltage control per channel - so you can fade in noise with an envelope, or have another oscillator amplitude modulating in and out of the sound via an LFO. That could maybe have switches to set a level, and then modulate from there, i.e. no knobs! 

Hope this post is a sign you are doing better, best wishes. 

Like I said before I used unity mixers in some cases, but the problem is that in the patches I made, there were a lot of patch cables needed for what in my mind should be an easier job.

first of all, most of the time I needed some (buffered) mults for some channels .
So I combined some sources, and needed to distribute that mix further.

I do not know about the power behind the electronics you want to use, but what I would like to see is 2 columns where every out signal has a copy, without bringing down or disturbing the signal. And if possible the final (4th) output of each mixer could even have 2 copies, or 3 outputs.

Another idea I had is that 4 exactly similar mixers could be a little much, so I thought maybe the last block could be a special one:
But because maybe you need 4 for some reason I would think it could be normal behaviour, but with a switch you could have another functionality:
If you use the 3th block, all the inputs from the 3th block are inverted, and defaulted to the 4th mixer.
(first row from mixer 3 inverted to the first row of mixer 4... etc. etc.)
But if you use one of the inputs of the 4th mixer, that input overules the inverted input from the 3th mixer.
or a switch per input could be possible : normal from 3th block, normal from 4th block, inverted from 3th block.

There were some patches where this kind of behaviour could save me a lot of space in the rack and a lot of cables.
Off course this is also possible for mixer  1 and 2.
I hope you understand what I mean Robert, otherwise I could try to draw some sketches to let you know what I mean.

Another point what could be used, (also in other mixers) is a kind of feedback from the endmix of 1 of the mixers to the inputs. (that was one of the strong points of the DSI mopho in my eyes). A kind of distortion effect will be possible with this possibility.

I actually really really really like this idea of the module. Only thing I can come up with is having an attenuation knob that could set the ratio of the inputs/outputs. I don't know if that's possible, but it would be a best of both worlds. To explain the attachment a bit: 

P1, P2, P3 stands for the patchpoints. The attenuation of the knob alters the level ratio of the patch points. This way you can still "dial" in the level to a certain extent.

I am firmly in favour of this idea ;-)