Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

Anyone using the uOSC? FMOS replacement?

new

« Prev
1
Next »

funbun
Admin Member

Posts: 915

Anyone using the uOSC? FMOS replacement? Oct 18, 2024 22:32:28 GMT

Quote

Post by funbun on Oct 18, 2024 22:32:28 GMT

I was wondering if any has used the uOCS? Is it the "replacement" for FMOS? How do you deal with the lack fine tune control? I remember running both 2ATTCV for finer control, but was not a true replacement for a fine trim pot.

Both my FMOS oscilators aren't working. Since the chip is no longer available, I was wondering if uOSC would be a better choice?

robertlanger
Administrator

Posts: 597

Anyone using the uOSC? FMOS replacement? Oct 20, 2024 15:02:06 GMT rockysmalls and funbun like this

Quote

Post by robertlanger on Oct 20, 2024 15:02:06 GMT

The uOSC does not FM, but the new uFM does! The uFM does basically everything the FMOS did, plus the bonus that it can be controlled via IMDI, and that it offers additional basic waveforms. Also, the pitch range is wider than the FMOS (where it was limited for technical reasons). Video coming soon!

Why aren't your FMOSs aren't working anymore? What's the problem? Let's discuss if you can get the uFM as compensation for a possibly defective module.