|
Post by pt3r on Jan 15, 2024 9:23:49 GMT
See the title. How conscious has your patching become over time? Not in an aphex twin kind of way (remember the bullshit stories he told reporters about recording music while sleeping?), but more in a, I make a specific connection in a premeditated way and once I turn up the volume the produced sound will be what I expected, way. When I got my first starter rack 3 years ago I was basically patching by trial and error, what happens when I route this patch point into this patch point etc... Which more than often resulted in very surprising sounds or no sounds at all which basically built my modular vocabular, I guess. Fast forward a couple of years and many more modules and it seems like my patching has become more premeditated, I patch much more with a certain goal in mind. Once I have a sound then I might elaborate on ways of modulating the result but apart from that there are less surprises. I guess I miss those early days of wonder where I was just discovering the modular and all its endless possibilities. This said, whenever I use the dAEdband module by keurslagerkurt I patch without any real expectation because I still don't really understand what the darn thing does
|
|
|
Post by maydonpoliris on Jan 15, 2024 10:17:30 GMT
At the start it was just wild patching too while either having a theme in mind or maybe I was led towards through the process..... As time went on while I still patch towards something once I get a hint of a sound the modulation is way more precise Have to say I still feel like I'm in the honeymoon period and there is something to discover in every patch but it's not as loose as in the early days
I try not to ever patch in my sleep though
|
|
|
Post by funbun on Jan 15, 2024 13:15:10 GMT
Yup, same here. Although I don't exactly know what things will sound like because I'm relying on psycho-acoustic phenomenon, I still have a general idea of where I'm going with a patch before starting.
|
|
|
Post by solipsistnation on Jan 15, 2024 17:45:35 GMT
I am almost 100% premeditated. I might be patching something in that applies chaos, but I like to know what that chaos is going to do. I do experiment when I'm messing around, but if I sit down and try to do a thing, that's basically always a particular goal and I know what is going to happen.
Part of this is because I like to know what each module does and have a pretty solid idea of what patching into it will do. Modules that are too uncontrollable or that don't react in ways I understand frustrate me because I don't want them going off and doing their own thing outside of whatever it is I really want them to do, if you see what I mean.
I do spend time when not sitting in front of my rig thinking about what I want to do with it though, and if what I've planned doesn't do what I want sometimes that's fine anyway. But I do tend to have some kind of sound in mind and work toward that.
|
|
pol
Wiki Editors
Posts: 1,278
Member is Online
|
Post by pol on Feb 10, 2024 20:06:15 GMT
I usually have an objective in mind when I program synths etc, but the AE encourages you to go with the happy accidents more, by happening more often and being really interesting when they do! My very first AE track a few years ago, "Alone on Europa" was my 2nd ever patch with it and I loved the lurchy sequence which is the core of the track. I was trying to do a slow bass line and it sort of is ...
|
|